Skip to content
A contracting project site with lifting equipment
Business & decisions

Cost is compared across sites, not lumped into one number

Project sites, their supervisors and managers, and the assignment of assets to them. Everything spent on an asset is charged to its project, making site-to-site comparison possible on one basis.

Before

What happens today without this module

  • 01Cost shows as one total, so nobody knows which site is draining it
  • 02A machine moves between two projects with no trace in the cost
  • 03Supervisor permissions aren’t bounded by their project’s scope
Capabilities

Exactly what this module does

  • Sites and supervisors

    Every project has its site and its responsible people.

  • Asset assignment

    Link the machine or vehicle to its project.

  • The backbone of scoping

    The project manager is pinned to his project, and every module filters to his scope — from movements and fuel to reports.

  • Permissions per project

    What the project manager can do (diesel, oils, accidents…) is set per project.

  • Project cost

    Every expense is charged to its site.

Inside the service

How it actually works in your company

When cost aggregates into a single company-wide figure, it is impossible to know which site is draining it. This module makes the project the unit of account: each project has its file with its location and responsible people, and every asset is assigned to a project so its records follow it — movements, fuel, oils, stock and inspections — to its site. The project manager gets an account confined to his project, with permissions tuned per project, so he runs his site fully without seeing anyone else's — and the general manager compares all sites on one basis.

01

A project file, not a name

A project in the system is a full record: name, city, address, map coordinates with a radius defining its perimeter, the project manager with his phone and ID number, the site supervisor likewise, and operating notes. These details are not decoration: the coordinates place the site on maps and anchor its recognized perimeter, and the responsible people's details appear on the documents and reports that carry the project's name, so every party knows whom it is addressing.

02

Assets carry records to their project

Assigning a machine or vehicle to a project is not a cosmetic field: everything recorded against the asset afterwards — its movements, fuel, oils, parts, inspections and fault reports — reads within its project's slice. When the manager asks about one site's consumption, nobody compiles numbers from scattered notebooks; the records themselves filter to that site's machines, and comparing projects becomes direct reading rather than a monthly estimation exercise.

03

A manager account bounded server-side

The project manager's account is pinned to his project, and the boundary is enforced at the server, not in the screen: every request passes through the project filter, so equipment, movements, fault reports, daily inspections, fuel, oils, inventory, documents, accidents and reports all come back scoped to his project alone. No forgotten setting and no leaking screen, because the limit is imposed where the data is produced, not where it is displayed — the difference between hiding and isolation.

04

Permissions tuned per project

What a project manager may do is decided by the general manager per project: diesel, oils and preventive maintenance are open by default because they are the site's daily work, while inventory, accidents and claims stay closed until deliberately opened, and settings is its own decision. Two projects in the same company can run under two different permission sets — trusting one disciplined site supervisor is no reason to open every door on every site.

05

Sites laid side by side

The overview page lays projects out as adjacent cards: each project's equipment count, its open fault reports, its pending inspections, and whether it has an active manager account. A half-minute glance exposes the site crowded with under-producing machines and the site whose reports pile up unattended, so management discussion starts from visible numbers, not impressions. The module's limits are explicit: it manages operations at project level; it is not a construction scheduling tool.

Inside the product

The screen as your team uses it

Projects
Screen of Projects
The flow

How the process runs end to end

  1. 01

    Create the project

    Its site and its responsible people

  2. 02

    Assignment

    The project’s assets

  3. 03

    Operation

    Cost accumulates against it

  4. 04

    A read view

    Each project’s performance and cost against the others

After rollout

What actually changes

No promises built on numbers we don’t know about your company. What follows is the structural difference of wiring this module into the rest of the platform.

Fair comparison
across sites
Defined accountability
each supervisor has his scope
Attributed cost
not lumped together

Limits of this module

The module manages operations at the project level, not the construction work schedule.

Try Projects on your own assets — not a generic example

We tailor the demo to your operation, starting with the module that blocks your team today.